jump to navigation

Article: Why Your Customers Don’t Want to Talk to You August 10, 2010

Posted by OnProcess Technology in Customer Care, Customer Experience Management, Customer Understanding Research.
Tags: , , ,
add a comment

Fascinating article in the Harvard Business Review
http://blogs.hbr.org/cs/2010/07/why_your_customers_dont_want_t.html

8:36 AM Wednesday July 28, 2010
by Matt Dixon and Lara Ponomareff

Have you ever walked into an airport, seen that there is nobody in line at the check-in counter, but still made a bee-line for the self-service kiosk? Better yet, have you everwaited in line for an ATM machine even though there is nobody in line for the teller inside the bank?

If you answered “yes” to either of these questions, you’re not alone. Most customers these days demonstrate a huge — and increasing — appetite for self-service, yet most companies run their operations as if customers prefer to interact with them live.

In our research on this topic (which we discuss in our recent HBR article “Stop Trying to Delight Your Customers“), we’ve found that corporate leaders dramatically overestimate the extent to which their customers actually want to talk to them. In fact, on average, companies tend to think their customers value live service more than twice as much as they value self service. But our data show that customers today are statistically indifferent about this — they value self-service just as much as using the phone. And guess what? By and large, this indifference holds regardless of their age, demographic, issue type, or urgency.

This attitude toward self-service has been a long time coming. Two-thirds of the customers we surveyed told us that three to five years ago, they primarily used the phone for service interactions. Today, less than a third do, and the number is shrinking fast.

What is it that makes self service so appealing? Maybe it’s the efficiency of the interaction — the airport kiosk is probably faster than interacting with a check-in agent — but that wouldn’t explain why we go out of our way to take care of our service needs ourselves. On a psychological level, it might have more to do with the unique element of control that self service affords. Or, maybe this self-service love affair is a product of our infatuation with gadgetry and electronic communication. All fairly benign explanations, to be sure.

But here’s a hypothesis that would be concerning if it’s right: maybe customers are shifting toward self service because they don’t want a relationship with companies. While this secular trend could be explained away as just a change in consumers’ channel preferences, skeptics might argue that customers never wanted the kind of relationship that companies have always hoped for, and that self service now allows customers the “out” they’ve been looking for all along.

For managers hell-bent on deepening relationships with their customers, that’s a sobering thought.

Consider this: Running your company as if customers want to talk to you isn’t just expensive, it’s potentially undermining your efforts to build longer-term loyalty. Our research shows that customers who attempt to self serve, fail, and are forced to pick up the phone are 10% more likely to be disloyal than those customers who were able to fully resolve their issues in their channel of choice. As one CFO remarked to us recently, “When you think about the relative cost of live service and the disloyalty effect of channel switching…it’s like paying your customers to be disloyal to you.”

How often does channel switching happen? All the time.

We found that a staggering 57% of inbound calls come from customers who first attempted to resolve their issue on the company’s website. And over 30% of callers are on the company’s website at the same time that they are talking to a rep on the phone. That’s a lot of frustrated customers.

What do you think? Are we simply seeing a change in customer preferences — or a relationship on the rocks?

Matthew Dixon is the managing director of the Corporate Executive Board’s Sales and Service PracticeLara Ponomareff is a research consultant with the Customer Contact Council, a division of the Corporate Executive Board’s Sales and Service Practice.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

Article: Comcast “Twitter Guy” leaving July 28, 2010

Posted by OnProcess Technology in Customer Care, Customer Experience Management.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

http://www.philly.com/inquirer/breaking/business_breaking/20100728_Twitter_guy_leaving_Comcast.html

Article from Philadelphia Enquirer.

Goodbye, Comcast Twitter guy.

Frank Eliason, the social media apostle who responded to tens of thousands of online Comcast Corp. customer complaints over the last two years, is leaving the cable company for a new challenge – helping banking giant Citigroup navigate the Internet to connect with banking customers.

Eliason’s new title is senior vice president in New York, a sweet one for a 37-year-old who began his career stocking shelves in Clover, Strawbridge’s former discount chain, in the late 1980s.

Thursday is Eliason’s last day at Comcast. He chatted with chief executive Brian Roberts on Wednesday morning – not the typical departure in a company with 100,000 employees – and then a grateful public relations department threw him a party.

Said Roberts in an e-mail: “Frank has had a huge impact on Comcast. He literally made himself available to our customers 24 hours a day and he created a team of people who are dedicated to do the same thing.”

Why the fuss?

In the depths of Comcast’s customer-service woes, a time when an elderly Virginia woman busted up a Comcast office with a hammer because her phone had died and a blogger launched the website Comcastmustdie, Eliason began combing the Internet for Comcast references and responded to online rants. He found many of those on Twitter, the quick-blurb social media site.

Eliason hit the Twitter moment almost perfectly. One business news story about Eliason and his Twittering led to another story and another. Soon, people were talking about Comcast’s innovative use of social media to improve customer service, instead of about Comcast’s customer service fiascoes.

Eliason’s department grew from himself to his current ten employees. Eliason, who has 42,000 followers on Twitter, said the Comcast digital-media group will remain Twittering.


Contact staff writer Bob Fernandez at 215-854-5897 or bob.fernandez@phillynews.com.


Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl

No Easy Answers to Excellence? December 9, 2009

Posted by OnProcess Technology in Customer Care, Customer Experience Management, Customer Understanding Research, OnProcess.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

(a.k.a., Real Solutions vs. Point Solutions)

There’s an old saying; “When you sell hammers, every problem is a nail”.

There are companies who will make phone calls for you.

There are companies who have machines that will make automated phone calls for you.

They’ll read what you tell them to say, until you tell them to stop.

And when they’re done, you’ll get your bill: We made X calls, for Y dollars. Net 30.

Check the box. Next.

Lots of activity, some outcomes, but not necessarily a solution to the problem your business really has.

What about the customer? Does anyone care about him or her? What’s the experience like for them? Did you learn anything from all that activity? Did you really educate the customer? Did you truly capture their input? Can you drive action as a result that will measurably improve your business?

There are no easy answers to excellence.

Or maybe there is one – OnProcess Technology®.

Not a software firm, not a call center, not a survey company. OnProcess Technology is in the results business.

OnProcess provides CE360™;  a comprehensive customer experience management solution that helps improve your customers’ experience in a number of ways.  CE360combines process methodology, multi-channel communications services and powerful data analysis to give you the clear insights you need to maximize customer satisfaction.

Increased Understanding Means Increased Usage, Reduced Remorse Returns

You can use CE360™ to increase your customers’ understanding of your current solutions or to help your customers smoothly upgrade to your newest offerings. Your results are a more positive customer experience, increased use of your products and services, and loyalty to your brand.

Identify Service Problems – Maximize ROI

You can also use CE360™ to assess your customers’ install, start-up or upgrade experience, enabling you to find weak points in your customer experience processes. By focusing investment on the most impactful areas, you maximize ROI and lift in satisfaction scores.

Compete on Service, Instead of Price

Ultimately, what this all comes down to is differentiation on service quality. Taking price out of the equation, to whatever extent possible, frees you up to be more profitable; to keep your customers loyal; to recover from occasional service glitches more easily, and to increase share in a competitive marketplace.

You don’t get those kinds of results by just ‘checking the box’.

–sk

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

destinationCRM.com: 5 Recession-Busting Customer Service Strategies March 9, 2009

Posted by OnProcess Technology in Customer Experience Management, Customer Understanding Research, OnProcess.
Tags: , , , , ,
2 comments

destinationCRM.com: 5 Recession-Busting Customer Service Strategies

Posted using ShareThis

More on the theme of boosting customer service and the customer experience, especially in this economic downturn. A Forrester Research report is framed in the article.

I found this quote particularly telling:

A major issue Petouhoff finds with many companies is that the c-level executives do not realize just how important customer service is to the bottom line.

Really?!

The article quotes the report further, highlighting five action steps to be taken:

Organizations looking to make the most of what customer service can offer in a poor economy must first lay a foundation before bolting on additional software, according to the report. Petouhoff recommends a five-step process, in which software evaluation is the final leg:

  1. Reject the old paradigms that treat a contact center as nothing more than a cost center.
  2. Demand ownership of the customer experience.
  3. Listen to your customers as you create your strategy.
  4. Conduct a gap analysis of your customer service offering and then implement best practices to address those gaps.
  5. Evaluate software with customer experience as the top goal for a business case.

Note that software is last in the list, purposefully. We like items 1 & 4 in particular. Hey — this IS our blog after all — we don’t sell software, we sell solutions and beneficial outcomes.

 

 

–sk

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.